primary source research at the intersection of regulatory filings and financial markets.
transparency lab is a primary source research shop. We read 10-Ks, S-1s, regulatory filings, valuation models, and lobbying dockets. Then we publish what we find. Every claim is checkable: it cites a specific document, page, and filing date.
Some filing patterns need the full treatment. We publish those as deep coverage: sourced to the page, available to everyone. They trace the timeline, the entities, the disclosures that shaped market outcomes and the capital behind them.
Other patterns point to something worth watching. A valuation gap. A regulatory exposure the market hasn't priced. A capital structure that looks different once you map who owns what and who controls whom. We publish those as research notes: shorter, more direct, and focused on what the data shows and what we think it means.
Both tracks cite only primary sources. Both follow the same writing rules. The difference is the format.
We build a structured picture of each company or sector from primary documents. Every claim traces to a named source with a specific page or filing date. The process runs in three steps.
SEC EDGAR, EIA energy data, congressional records, FCC dockets, commodity markets, lobbying disclosures. Automated ingestion across thousands of filings. No outside data vendors. No unnamed sources. If it is not in the record, it is not in the analysis.
Entity resolution across CIKs, filing types, and connected-party disclosures. Capital flow mapping. Ownership graph construction. Timeline assembly. Relationships that are technically disclosed but invisible inside a 200-page 10-K get surfaced and named.
Anomaly detection against peer benchmarks. Valuation gap analysis. Regulatory exposure scoring. The output is always traceable to a source document, and it always concludes something. We do not publish neutrally on questions where the data points clearly.
In the Tesla CEO compensation investigation, we processed 1,748 EDGAR filings across 12 CIKs and flagged 10 structural anomalies. The most significant: three instances where insider sales by board members preceded adverse governance events by fewer than 10 trading days — each disclosed in Form 4 filings that, taken individually, appear routine. Taken together, the pattern is visible only once the full filing set is assembled and sequenced.
The chart below shows insider sale volume against three key governance events in the Tesla record: the Delaware court voiding the 2018 pay package, the shareholder vote restoring it, and the board's approval of two subsequent awards. Each bar represents total shares disposed by Tesla insiders in a 30-day window around each event. The source for every data point is a Form 4 filed with the SEC.
Everything here is documented analysis. Every claim traces to a primary source. We tell you where to look so you can check us.
New research notes before they go public. Sector coverage updates and what we are watching. As the research expands, you will hear first.
one email. no tracking. unsubscribe anytime.